
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Adolphus2 |
The Nuclear Weapon....right or wrong? |
Lead | |
|
This is stuck in my mind. Was it morally wrong for the US to use a nuclear weapon against Japan. People have told me we would have lost the war without it but at what cost did we win? 100,000 people died as a result of the first attack. Such a huge loss of life at once, not only was it a great lost of life but over 95% of the people who died in the attack were civilians. Ordinary people who were not combatants at all. Some say it was payback for Pearl Harbor. Well, look at this 3,000 or so people died on that day. Over 30x that many people died because of the bomb, that's not getting even. An even now we live in a world that fears what someone else might do if they have one. Was that invention one of mankind's achievements or one of its many failures to its fellow man? What do you think on this subject?
![]() |
|||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
|||
Unregistered(d) |
Unknown | ||
|
(This post is missing and can not be restored)
|
|||
WorldwideNobody |
Re: Unknown | ||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||
GoldenRoya |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
I read somewhere that the nuclear bombs were dropped more with a view towards intimidating the USSR than towards prompting a peace with Japan; the first shot of the Cold War rather than the final shot of WWII. One of those History's Mysteries, I think.
Television intends to keep you stupid. |
|||
Crazy Dave Number 23 |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
It undoubtedly served both purposes. To intimidate the mortal enemy of the United States by showing off our weapon and precipitating the arms race, as well as forcing Japanese capitulation. Having to conquer Japan would have resulted in an estimated 1 million American casualties and countless more Japanese, as they fought to the death to protect their homeland. The war was most certainly over in that the United States would overcome, but The Bomb was a means of preventing further casualties.
I don't care to get into the moral relativism, i.e. the value of these lives versus the value of those lives versus of the value of an idea. Ideally, killing is unacceptable, but when war breaks out how do you compare one tragedy to another? It's all destruction in the end no matter how "right" or "fair" or "helpful" you think you may be. |
|||
Skullmaster |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
|
|||
Crazy Dave Number 23 |
Re: Unknown | ||
Skullmaster |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
meh, still impressive
![]() ![]() |
|||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||
Skullmaster |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
Sure It's not, it's not as bad as the air to air nukes they used to fire at each other's planes in the war. Blew themselves up. Or the surface to air ones where their radar was so weak they had to fire the nukes while still within it's blast radius.
![]() ![]() |
|||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||
Skullmaster |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
Because they are like huge fireworks, but with a lot more explosiveness, and lots of death, death is teh win!!!!1
![]() ![]() |
|||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||
Marte666 |
Re: Unknown | ||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||
Marte666 |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
Uma, it's the famous testimonies from Hiroshima victims....
Marte
</3 |
|||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||
Dragon3489 |
Re: Unknown | ||
|
The dropping of the two Atomic weapons on Japan in 1945 was said to bring the end of WWII in the Pacific. It was used so that thousands, maybe more American lives would be spared instead of invading Japan itself whose, population was taught/brainwashed/forced to fight ANY American invader to the death. The whole country as a whole was ready to die. But, on the subject of dropping it and the weapon(s) being invented, I see them as a last resort but, also as tools to our own destruction. The Nuclear weapon was made not to end wars but, to end all life in one singe, devestating blow.
There is a book about this, its called Downfall. Can't miss it. First hand accounts from the Fire bombings on Tokoyo (spelling is off I think) all the way up to orders to drop the bombs to the people who survived the blasts. I see footage of those and I shudder just thinking about how even more destructive they have become from, just a simple bomb to weapons that have multiple indepent targeting warheads that could wipe out half if not, all major cities of a single nation. They were meant to bring about destruction and thats it, not peace. Now we have terroists and rouge nations trying to get their hands or developing them. The Cold War isn't over, no, we are still in the begining of it. Lets not forget though, the U.S. Government tested Nuclear weapons and it's affects on U.S. Soldiers and others. Yet, again, I see these weapons of destruction as a means to end all life in one single move. I may say things like "Lets just turn Iraq into a parking lot." But, I know what that would mean and I know the affects that it would cause. I support and I don't support the bombs dropped on Japan nor would I condone it being done again. Stalin KNEW of the Manhattan project and it's progress all the way up to 1945. In fact Russia was working on it's program and America didn't even know it. Stalin had a spy in there, told him everything. I don't think that the drops were done to scare the Russians or Stalin for that matter or show off. Why show off for someone who already knows what you are going to show off? Everyone has their views on this whole subject. I'll end mine here, besides, I've typed too much and I've got some Chinese food getting cold ^_^ . ![]() |
|||
umaeril |
Re: Unknown | ||